Chas Macquarie and Mark Reynolds: Wildfires underscore urgency to rein in climate change

Recently, I’ve taken to wearing a mask outside – not because of COVID-19 – but because of all the smoke. I am going outside as little as possible and my friends who have asthma are feeling the smoke effects even more than I am. We have friends and family in the Bay Area and in the Sierra foothills who were under an evacuation warning for several days. Fortunately, their homes were spared.

The fall fire season hasn’t even started, and already we’ve seen an astonishing amount of destruction. In California, 2.6 million acres have gone up in smoke, exceeding the 2 million acres burned in 2018. That year, the damage and economic loss from wildfires, according to AccuWeather, came to $400 billion. At the end of August, nearly 4,000 homes and other structures had been consumed by wildfires this year in California. By early September, social media feeds were filled with photos of orange, smoky skies, and death tolls continue to climb across multiple western states.

The explanation for the increasing intensity and frequency of wildfires is pretty straightforward: Climate change is making forests drier and the weather hotter, conditions in which a lightning strike can ignite a fire that quickly destroys thousands of acres. Climate scientist Park Williams of Columbia University told the New York Times ( ) “Behind the scenes of all of this, you’ve got temperatures that are about two to three degrees Fahrenheit warmer now than they would have been without global warming.”

On our current trajectory, temperatures will continue to climb, bringing more fires and greater destruction. These wildfires also create a feedback loop that exacerbates climate change by releasing massive amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

Unforeseen crises are also made worse by climate change. As we struggle to persevere through the coronavirus pandemic, for example, smoke from fires causes respiratory problems that can make the virus more deadly. People fleeing fires may also contend with crowded shelters that can spread the disease.

With the impact of climate change being felt here and now, we find ourselves running out of time to bring down the heat-trapping pollution that is warming our world. We must therefore use all the tools at our disposal to curtail those emissions.

One of the most effective tools is an ambitious price on carbon that will speed up the transition to a low- or zero-carbon economy. A tax or fee on carbon can have a positive impact on low- and middle-income families, too. How? Take the revenue from a carbon fee and distribute it to all households.

Legislation to implement an effective carbon price while protecting the economic well-being of people has been introduced in the U.S. House as the Energy Innovation and Carbon Dividend Act (H.R. 763). The carbon fee is expected to drive down carbon emissions 40% in the first 12 years and 90% by 2050. A Household Impact Study, ( released in August found that 61% of all households would receive “carbon dividends” that exceed their increased carbon costs, thus protecting lower income families.

Our smoke-filled skies should serve as a warning that our climate could one day be unbearable if we fail to take the actions necessary to rein in climate change. An effective price on carbon with the money given to households can put us on the path to preserving a livable world. Please ask Rep. Mark Amodei to support H.R. 763.

Chas Macquarie is a Carson City resident and a member of the Carson City chapter of Citizens’ Climate Lobby. Mark Reynolds is the executive director of Citizens’ Climate Lobby.


Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment