State Supreme Court: Employees can be fired for pot use

The Nevada Supreme Court building Monday, March 4, 2019.

The Nevada Supreme Court building Monday, March 4, 2019. Photo: David Calvert / The Nevada Independent

The Nevada Supreme Court on Thursday rejected the argument that, since using pot is not a criminal offense in Nevada, bosses can’t legally fire a worker for marijuana use when not at work.
Danny Ceballos filed suit after he was terminated as a dealer at Palace Station.

According to the unanimous opinion, he tested positive for marijuana after arriving for work because he had used the drug at home the night before. He cited state statute creating a “private right of action” for employees who are fired for the lawful use of any product outside the premises of their workplace when off duty.

The justices agreed with the district court decision that marijuana use doesn’t qualify for that protection because even though adult recreational use is not a crime in Nevada, it remains unlawful because another statute allows employers to prohibit the use of pot by employees and the drug remains illegal at the federal level.

Ceballos was tested after he slipped and fell in the employee break room and he was terminated.
The opinion by Justice Kris Pickering also rules that while recreational marijuana use was decriminalized by the Legislature and governor, it remains illegal. Recreational pot was decriminalized by a voter initiative effective Jan. 1, 2017. That initiative stated that adult recreational marijuana use is “exempt from state prosecution.”

But justices ruled that doesn’t make it lawful. They ruled that state laws cannot completely legalize marijuana use because the drug remains illegal under federal law which must be followed in Nevada. They quoted a similar case in Colorado that stated that nothing in the statute limits the term “lawful” to state law.

Therefore, Ceballos’s use of marijuana isn’t protected by the Nevada statute and Palace Station had the legal power to fire him for violating company policy


Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment